Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
Keep your commit strategy as is [with small commits], and create a branch whenever you want review and in that branch you squash the commits as appropriate
Are you suggesting that the squashed patches get merged, or that the squashed patches get reviewed but the finer-granulated patches get merged? In the former case, I'd probably prefer to work with larger patches in the first place (and not just squash them on the review branch), since they are easier to handle -- e.g. I sometimes need to go back and change things in earlier commits, and in those cases larger commits are easier.
-- Lea -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
