Re: Re* [PATCH] "not uptodate" changed to "has local changes"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Wincent Colaiuta <win@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> El 17/5/2008, a las 21:03, Junio C Hamano escribió:
>> +	/* not_uptodate_file */
>> +	"Entry '%s' not uptodate. Cannot merge.",
>
>
> Minor nit, "uptodate" is not a word. Should be either "up-to-date" or
> "up to date"; most dictionaries list both.

Why does *everybody* keep missing the whole point of this patch?

Grumble.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux