Re: [PATCH] "not uptodate" changed to "has local changes"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Steven Walter <stevenrwalter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> With this dedication to backwards-compatibility, we'll be at Windows
> Vista quality in no time.

I very much agree here, given the nature of scripts (that is, being
very easy to update), I think we should try not to be too strict in
backwards-compatibility or we'll lose the flexibility that is very
much needed when developing a Good Product (tm) As long as such
compatibility breaking changes are marked (in BIG LETTERS) in the
changelog/release notes I think that would be a 'sacrifice' we should
consider making.

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux