Re: [PATCH] "not uptodate" changed to "has local changes"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Johannes Schindelin > But I strongly
disagree with the notion that it is okay to fsck with
> old-timers (who would be harmed by breaking backwards-incompatibility,
> and nobody else), especially given that it is mostly old-timers who turned
> Git into the Good Product(tm) it is.

But those old-timers can be updated can't they? Also, shouldn't we
have tests to see if they 'break' because of changes?

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux