Christian Stimming writes: > > Well, the commits aren't in date order, strictly speaking, and the > > last commit isn't necessarily the oldest (though the first commit will > > in fact be the newest). How about: > > > > <Home> Move to head of list > > <End> Move to tail of list > > > > Would that be any clearer? > > I think "head of list" and "tail of list" are more the terms about the > implementation detail and not so much an explanation that is easily > understood for the user. I think some combination using the word "top" should > rather be used to make it really clear we're talking about the upper end of > the window. The list isn't just a detail, it's what the user sees in the top pane: the commits, listed in some order. How about "top of list" and "bottom of list"? Or "start of list" and "end of list"? Paul. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
