Am Freitag, 2. Mai 2008 13:49 schrieb Paul Mackerras: > > By the way, the following two keybinding explanations seem ambiguous to me: > > > <Home> Move to first commit > > > <End> Move to last commit > > > > What happens is that <home> jumps to the newest commit and <end> jumps to > > the oldest commit. Whether the "first" commit should be the newest or the > > oldest is, well, somewhat ambiguous. I'd propose to talk about the newest > > or topmost commit, but rather not about the "first". > > Well, the commits aren't in date order, strictly speaking, and the > last commit isn't necessarily the oldest (though the first commit will > in fact be the newest). How about: > > <Home> Move to head of list > <End> Move to tail of list > > Would that be any clearer? I think "head of list" and "tail of list" are more the terms about the implementation detail and not so much an explanation that is easily understood for the user. I think some combination using the word "top" should rather be used to make it really clear we're talking about the upper end of the window. Christian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
