Hi, On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > I mean, I just wonder why as long as I had one remote only, I could > write "git push", while now I have to write "git push origin && git push > mirror". The patch to "git fetch" comes from this observation too, and > I think it is a good idea, even though I'm less attached to it and it > would influence my workflow much less. I wonder why you need to make such a big change, which _is_ incompatible, and not do the obvious thing, namely introduce a subcommand to "git remote" which does the "push" equivalent of "git remote update"... Do you really think that it is a good idea to push down a huge change like this down everybody else's throat, just because you do not want to type "git remote ..." but "git fetch ..." in your workflow? Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
