Re: [PATCH v2 04/13] Teach rebase interactive the mark command

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> >> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> >> 
> >> > So I really hate the idea of introducing yet other marks when we already 
> >> > have unique identifiers: the (abbreviated) commit names.
> >> 
> >> Didn't I give you an example why commit object names are _not_ unique 
> >> identifiers already?
> >
> > By that reasoning, rebase -i cannot work anyway: it relies on the 
> > abbreviated identifiers, not on anything else, for the "pick" command.
> 
> No, read the message again and think for 5 minutes.

pick abcdefg
pick pqrstuv

Now imagine that pqrstuv is a unique commit name _before_ cherry-picking 
abcdefg, but not _after_ it.  Unlikely?  Yes.  Impossible?  No.

Ciao,
Dscho

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux