Re: [PATCH v2 04/13] Teach rebase interactive the mark command

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > So I really hate the idea of introducing yet other marks when we already 
> > have unique identifiers: the (abbreviated) commit names.
> 
> Didn't I give you an example why commit object names are _not_ unique
> identifiers already?

By that reasoning, rebase -i cannot work anyway: it relies on the 
abbreviated identifiers, not on anything else, for the "pick" command.

> I also do not understand why you think 'mark' is ugly.

Is that not obvious?  You _already_ have identifiers.  And there you add 
other ones.  Only because the original idea of the -p implementation was 
ignored.

Ciao,
Dscho

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux