On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 10:22:47PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > I think "git pull" is different, because it is more often fetching from > one defined place (while Shawn said that he has a need for one-to-many > "git push"es and so do I). For "git pull", the branch config provides a > valuable default more often than for "git push". I think it is highly dependent on your workflow. I would have said the exact opposite. For example, on one project, I keep a "working" repo on my laptop where I develop and integrate work from others. I get their work by pulling individually from other developers. But when I push, it always goes to one place: my "publish" repo, where the other developers will grab my changes. In that workflow, I pull from many different places, but always push to one. I assumed that is actually similar to the Linus "integrator" workflow (although I think he just does one-shot pulls without defining remotes). -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
