"Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > But then they later wonder why they need `git pull origin branch` > to merge in branch, when they usually just say `git pull`. What is > the need for that funny keyword `origin`? Why do I have to say > where to get the branch from sometimes and not others? > ... > Just take the above as the rantings of someone who knows git a > little too well, and has tried to teach it to people who don't, > and they all have asked about the funny (to them) need for origin > in git-pull/git-push command line sometimes (no refspecs) and not > others (with refspecs). What's the constructive suggestion for improvement we can draw from this after all? Should we deprecate the defaulting of "origin" so that everybody now should always say "git pull $where"? In other words, make people more aware that what _they_ do is the special case to have only one remote to interact with? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
