Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not use whitespace.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Sun, 27 Apr 2008, Brian Gernhardt wrote:

>  Should this construct go into CodingStyle?  I seem to have to write 
>  patches like this every month or so.

Yes, probably.  I am very sorry, I really should have reviewed those 
patches better (I know that ":" in expr is better than "match", "tac" is 
something to be avoided, and "wc -l" can output whitespace).  It did not 
help that I hated the fact that that series changed the original design 
without even understanding it.

Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux