Re: Friendly refspecs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King wrote (2008-04-23 05:21 -0400):

> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 05:16:06AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> 
> > > Historically we did not favor one way or another for the general
> > > purpose syntax.  I think Jeff's proposed heuristics to favor
> > > branch if a branch tip is pushed and tag if a tag is pushed makes
> > > sense.
> > 
> > OK, here is a cleaned up patch with tests.
> 
> Oops, I forgot to mention: there is a broken test in t5516 that is
> revealed by this change. The patch below should be applied before the
> DWIM one.

I did some testing and your patches seem to work. I think push refspecs
are frendlier now. :) It's great to see you guys taking users seriously
and working on possible problems. Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux