Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > The "refs/heads/" dwimmery makes sense to me, because: > > 1. it changes a behavior which is currently an error condition, so > we're not hurting anyone's existing workflow > > 2. In my usage, pushing a branch to a tag (or vice versa) is the > exception, so I don't mind favoring pushing like types to like > types. > > But I recognize that (2) is based on my own workflow, so if people > disagree, I guess it isn't so for everyone. So the proposal is: "git push $there $commit:$name", when $name does not begin with refs/, is interpreted as "git push $there $commit:refs/heads/$name" right? I think that makes sense, at least to me. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
