Teemu Likonen kirjoitti: > Adam's 'git graph' is a way of viewing log (in terminal environment), > it looks very similar to 'git log --pretty=oneline' and it accepts > very much the same command line options. That's why I see 'git log' > being logical place for such functionality. > > Actually, to me it would be more logical if 'git whatchanged' was > 'git log --changed' or '--verbose / -v' something. May I add that I'm the kind of user who only understands the porcelain Git. In my mindset it's best when commands are in logical units by their functionality (from user's point of view). I see 'git log' as a command for studying history log and to me 'git whatchanged' sounds like some user's personal _alias_ to 'git log --raw --full-history --always' or something (thanks Jeff). Similarly 'git graph' sounds like an alias to 'git log --pretty=graph' for someone who uses this a lot. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
