Stephen Sinclair kirjoitti: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@xxxxxx> wrote: > > I just want to say that I really like your 'git graph'. I would > > like to see it integrated to 'git log', perhaps as 'git log > > --pretty=graph' or 'git log --graph'. > > Any reason? > > I don't see why it's necessary to bundle all useful commands into one > big super-command. I like the idea of typing "git-graph". > Then again, I happen to like the git-command syntax which seems to > have fallen out of favour, so don't pay attention to me. Adam's 'git graph' is a way of viewing log (in terminal environment), it looks very similar to 'git log --pretty=oneline' and it accepts very much the same command line options. That's why I see 'git log' being logical place for such functionality. Actually, to me it would be more logical if 'git whatchanged' was 'git log --changed' or '--verbose / -v' something. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
