Re: [PATCH] mktag.c: improve verification of tagger field and tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Brandon Casey wrote:
> Carlos Rica wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 1:40 AM, Brandon Casey <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>  Well, since I looked at this code and used it in filter-branch, I figured I
>>>  should fix the verification code for the tagger field (even though it's
>>>  probably dieing soon).
>>>
>>>  I'm thinking this utility should be fairly strict about the format it accepts.
>> Why not using git-tag to make tags in filter-branch?

I replied, and then I thought, maybe you didn't notice that patch I submitted
for filter-branch.

So, to clarify, I am not using mktag at a user-level. i.e. I am not using it in a
script that I supplied _to_ filter-branch. I added a call to it from _within_
filter-branch so that the "object" part of tag objects can be retained when filtering.

-brandon

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux