Re: [StGit PATCH 0/6] Two bugfixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 25/03/2008, Karl Hasselström <kha@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2008-03-25 10:46:00 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>  > I personally prefer the current "refresh" way but maybe because I'm
>  > used to it. It would be useful to get other users' opinion on this
>  > UI change. Might not be a bad change since git does this already,
>  > quilt needs an explicit "add" (anyone knows about guilt?).
>
>
> I think my preference would be to to what git does: let just "stg
>  refresh" commit what's in the index, and have "stg refresh -a" or
>  something to automatically update the index first. (This should be
>  easy to do, btw -- refresh already has an --index flag.)
>
>  In general, I think it's a bad idea to do things differently from git
>  without a good reason.

We can give this a try on the master branch and see how it goes.

-- 
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux