Re: [PATCH 2/2] filter-branch.sh: support nearly proper tag name filtering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, 24 Mar 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> >> If you tell filter-branch to filter a branch A and a tag T, as the 
> >> command is advertised to rewrite positive refs that were given from 
> >> the command line, isn't it natural to expect that the command would 
> >> attempt its best effort to rewrite such a tag object?
> >
> > The thing is: signed tags cannot be rewritten.
> 
> I know that, and you know I know that if you read what you responded 
> again ;-)
> 
> And I think stripping of gpg signature part is a reasonable best effort 
> for the command, _when_ the user told a signed tag to be rewritten.

Yes.

BUT.

You can say "--all", and I actually expect quite a few people to do 
exactly that.  And then you cannot really say "the user explicitely asked 
to have that signed tag rewritten".

Ciao,
Dscho

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux