Re: [PATCH] New test for preserve merges and squash

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thu, 20 Mar 2008, Jörg Sommer wrote:

> Junio C Hamano schrieb am Wed 19. Mar, 17:28 (-0700):
> > Jörg Sommer <joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jörg Sommer <joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > The current version of git fails this test. I think it's a bug, 
> > > because the patch is what I expect to happen. Or am I wrong?
> > 
> > Please mark such tests with test_expect_fail.
> 
> No, I expect the test succeeds. Currently, it fails. This might be, 
> because my expectations are wrong or there's a bug.

The definition of "test_expect_fail" is: this should succeed, but needs 
fixin'.

> > And also Cc: the guilty parties.
> 
> Okay, I've added Johannes the author of f09c9b8c5ff to the Cc: list.
> 
> Johannes, can you explain why this test fails?

At the moment, I can't, because I indeed missed your original mail.  Maybe 
I'll find time this afternoon to dive into gmane to find your original 
mail.

Ciao,
Dscho

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux