Re: [PATCH] New test for preserve merges and squash

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Junio C Hamano schrieb am Wed 19. Mar, 17:28 (-0700):
> Jörg Sommer <joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Jörg Sommer <joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > The current version of git fails this test. I think it's a bug, because
> > the patch is what I expect to happen. Or am I wrong?
> 
> Please mark such tests with test_expect_fail.

No, I expect the test succeeds. Currently, it fails. This might be,
because my expectations are wrong or there's a bug.

> And also Cc: the guilty parties.

Okay, I've added Johannes the author of f09c9b8c5ff to the Cc: list.

Johannes, can you explain why this test fails?

Bye, Jörg.
-- 
> Definiere ‚Demokratie‘ …
… eine Mehrheit beweist einer Minderheit, dass Widerstand zwecklos ist.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux