Re: [PATCH] gc: call "prune --expire 2.weeks.ago"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> Yes.
>
> In any case, most likely these objects would have been packed anyway 
> during that period, so they would have been pruned by the repack called by 
> git-gc.

Yes, that is the most probable way for these unused cruft to get removed.

> My patch really, really is about _unreferenced_ loose objects, i.e. 
> something you get by multiple "git add"s without commits.  And by merge 
> conflicts.
>
> IOW by objects that were never referenced by commit objects.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux