On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > > > If "--prune" is passed to gc, it still just calls "git prune". > > Otherwise, "prune --expire 2.weeks.ago" is called, where the grace > > period is overrideable by the config variable gc.pruneExpire. > > "What it does." > > > While adding a test to t5304-prune.sh (since it really tests the > > implicit call to "prune"), the original test for "prune --expire" > > is moved there from t1410-reflog.sh, where it did not belong. > > "What the fallouts from this change were." > > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> > > Can we also have "why this is a good idea", "what problem this solves"? FWIW, my agreeing with the "why this is a good idea" can be translated into: Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
