Re: [PATCH] builtin-clone: fix for new unpack_trees() semantics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Sun, 9 Mar 2008, Daniel Barkalow wrote:

> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> 
> > Yes.  And this sets dst_index (what I tried to hint at with my patch).
> 
> Oh, yes. Your patch is what prompted me to fix that part (and to find 
> that Linus's unpack_trees was in next now). But seeing src_index in your 
> patch made me wonder what it wanted a source index for anyway, since 
> this is the first index we've had in this repo.

Well, stupid copy-'n-paste.  Well, not all that stupid: because of the 
twoway_merge (and because the segmentation fault was in a line accessing 
src_index), I assumed that the src_index is needed.

But your explanation that oneway_merge is all we want makes tons of sense.

Ciao,
Dscho

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux