Re: [PATCH] builtin-clone: fix for new unpack_trees() semantics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 9 Mar 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> In git.git's "next" branch, unpack_trees() must specify source and target 
> index.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> 	To be squashed into 10/11
> 
>  builtin-clone.c |    2 ++
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/builtin-clone.c b/builtin-clone.c
> index e4047ed..3890e12 100644
> --- a/builtin-clone.c
> +++ b/builtin-clone.c
> @@ -534,6 +534,8 @@ int cmd_clone(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  		opts.verbose_update = !option_quiet;
>  		opts.merge = 1;
>  		opts.fn = twoway_merge;
> +		opts.src_index = &the_index;
> +		opts.dst_index = &the_index;

Actually, I think the sensible thing is to just not do a merge here, since 
we know there's no index beforehand and the two trees are the same.

I think the odd twoway merge of two copies of HEAD is just an artifact of 
clone originally just doing "git checkout HEAD", and that got translated 
various times failing to notice the special cases.

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux