Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg.lists@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Verify a few more commands and pathname variants. > > Signed-off-by: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > t/t7010-setup.sh | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > These are a few testcases from my earlier attempt at this. The > log and commit cases succeeded with Junios version, but not > blame and some of the nastier versions for git add (same > principle for all commands, just that I use add as an example) I am very sorry about replying to an ancient topic, but I think I misread your patch. > +test_expect_failure 'add a directory outside the work tree' ' > + d1="$(cd .. ; pwd)" && > + git add "$d1" > + echo $? > +' What I think I misunderstood was that you _wanted_ this (after removing the "echo", which was a mistake, which we already talked about) to fail. Somehow I ended up committing test_expect_success, which I think was a mistake, and I am asking for a sanity-check. Likewise for the other two tests. These "add outside" should fail, right? > +test_expect_failure 'add a file outside the work tree, nasty case 1' '( > + f="$(pwd)x" && > + touch "$f" && > + git add "$f" > +)' > + > +test_expect_failure 'add a file outside the work tree, nasty case 2' '( > + f="$(pwd|sed "s/.$//")x" && > + touch "$f" && > + git add "$f" > +)' > + > test_done -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
