Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Shawn O. Pearce schrieb: > > Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > >> > >>> The new option "--auto-follow-tags" allows the caller to request that > >>> any annotated tag be included into the packfile if the object the tag > >>> references was also included as part of the packfile. > >> Wouldn't "auto-include-tag" a better name for this option? > > > > Ooooh. Indeed it would! > > > > I shall respin this series based around this better name. > > More bikeshedding: Why are you calling it "auto-"? If I tell the program > to "--include-tags", I expect it to happen automatically. Because its more automatic than manually including tags? I don't know. Junio, if you haven't already merged this topic into someplace that I can't rewrite the series for a _3rd_ time, I might be willing to respin it without the "auto-" prefix. We are unlikely to ever have a reason to support "--manually-include-tags". Stone tablet based computing stopped being fun back in the '50s. -- Shawn. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
