Hello,
On Tuesday 04 March 2008 12:32:57 Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Michal Rokos <michal.rokos@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >> On how many different platforms was this configure check tested on?
> >
> > Test works on Linux (no FREAD_READS_DIRECTORIES) and HPUXes
> > (FREAD_READS_DIRECTORIES): HP-UX B.11.23 ia64 (Itanium) and HP-UX B.11.11
> > 9000/800 (PaRisc)
> >
> > Do you want me to resend with "."?
>
> Probably resending with "." and asking the list audiences for help in
> testing would help you gather success reports on different platforms.
Will do... Did that.
Do you think that there's some reason not-to merge it? I mean if fopen(".")
throws an error, FREAD_READS_DIRECTORIES will NOT be defined - as is it now.
I don't know how many people cares about configure script since there are
missing bits in it again and again. I believe it could receive good amount of
testing only when it's merged in.
I'm trying to make GIT working on HPUX - next patch in my queue is about
broken vsnprintf() that returns -1 on maxsize overrun. Do you think that it's
more likely that patch will be accepted when I omit "broken vsnprintf()"
detection code from configure.ac?
MR
--
Michal Rokos
NextSoft s.r.o.
Vyskočilova 1/1410
140 21 Praha 4
phone: +420 267 224 311
fax: +420 267 224 307
mobile: +420 736 646 591
e-mail: michal.rokos@xxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
