Re: git fetch: where are the downloaded objects stored?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Paolo Ciarrocchi" <paolo.ciarrocchi@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>  > What is still not clear to me is where git is storing
>  > the objects downloaded during a git fetch operation.
>
>  git fetch downloads the objects to the object database, i.e.
>  .git/objects/, usualy as a pack.

Ok, thanks.

>  Now, just "having" the objects locally doesn't change much, an object
>  starts being really interesting if you have a reference (typically, a
>  branch) pointing to it. "git fetch" will update the remote references
>  (for example, origin/master), but won't touch the working tree, and
>  won't do any merge, fast-forward or not, to a local branch. So, most
>  likely, "git fetch" will be followed by either a merge or a rebase.

Yes, your explanation perfectly match my understanding.

I was, and I'm still, confused by the following sentence in the git merge
documentation:
"A merge is always between the current HEAD and one or more remote
branch heads"

If I think to the following scenario:

 git fetch
 git diff (to look at what I downloaded via git fetch)
 gir merge

I don't see a merge between the current HEAD and a _remote_ branch.

Ciao,
-- 
Paolo
http://paolo.ciarrocchi.googlepages.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux