Re: [PATCH] Improve t6029 to check the real "subtree" case

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Miklos Vajna wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 09:45:03AM +0000, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > Why yet another file?  Why not enhance t6029, as suggested?
> 
> here it is.

Thanks.

> diff --git a/t/t6029-merge-subtree.sh b/t/t6029-merge-subtree.sh
> index 3900a05..35d66e8 100755
> --- a/t/t6029-merge-subtree.sh
> +++ b/t/t6029-merge-subtree.sh
> @@ -29,4 +29,51 @@ test_expect_success 'subtree available and works like recursive' '
>  
>  '
>  
> +test_expect_success 'setup' '

I'd call this 'setup subproject', but that's just nitpicking.

Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux