Re: [offtopic?] xdelta patch format wrapper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Martin Langhoff wrote:

> I don't think I'll use *any* git code at all for the time being. If it
> was trivial to produce a statically compiled git-diff.exe and
> git-apply-patch.exe that work without funny dependencies on any windows
> box then I would.

It is trivial.

Except that we do not have any git-apply-patch.exe.  Maybe you meant 
git-apply.exe?

> Don't think any of the windows ports of git are there (even though they 
> are excellent!).

How can you say that they are excellent, and then say they are not there 
yet?

FWIW I just checked.  In msysGit, git-apply.exe and git-diff.exe are 
identical (no mystery there: they are both builtins), and weigh in with 
2893142 bytes.

If you're serious about wanting something reliable, quick, but smaller 
than that, it should be _trivial_ to cut down.  For example, a simple 
"strip git-diff.exe" brings it down to 821248 bytes.

And that's without removing all the other builtins, which would be 
trivial, too (just cull "struct cmd_struct commands" in git.c, and 
"BUILT_INS" and "BUILTIN_OBJS" in the Makefile).

Hth,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux