Re: [offtopic?] xdelta patch format wrapper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Martin Langhoff <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> I am lost as to your objective because you seem to be keeping a
>> whole LOT more than I would have imagined for a specialized
>> purpose file format.
>
> My source files are 2 zipfiles that I know contain 1 xml file, and then
> may contain any arbitrary files. As a specialised file format is a
> pretty general case ;-) Because of compression, xdeltas of the zipfiles
> aren't good. So what I want to do is to diff the 2 unzipped directories
> - nothing git-specific, I could use diff -urN.
>
> Git diff *is* better in that it handles binary files, but we pay a
> sizable cost in being reversible.

Did I forget to say that I am Ok with --oneway option?

In fact, we started as oneway but we _fixed_ it to make it
reversible soon after the initial version ;-)  So "git apply"
still can grok oneway format.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux