Re: Merge-Recursive Improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Voltage Spike wrote:
> > 
> > First, git is overly zealous at merging differences and two functions 
> > added at the same point in a file become intertwined during the merge. 
> > A trivial example of this behavior:
> 
> Hmm. Have you tested what happens if you use XDL_MERGE_EAGER instead of 
> XDL_MERGE_ZEALOUS in the "level" argument to xdl_merge() in 
> merge-recursive.c?
> 
> (No, I didn't test it myself, but it may get you the behaviour you want, 
> and we could make it a config option for people who want a less 
> aggressive merge)

Actually, I have this in my ever-growing TODO:

XDL_MERGE_ZEALOUS_ALNUM: require an alnum in the common code; otherwise do 
not de-conflict it.

In other words, if there is a hunk consisting of conflicting lines, which 
are identical, but have no letter and no number in it, then keep them as 
conflicts.

But I never got around to try it.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux