Re: [PATCH 1/9] Allow callers of unpack_trees() to handle failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> ...
>> BTW after the whole series (was too lazy to check the individual 
>> patches), I count one instance in builtin-checkout.c and two in diff-lib.c 
>> where unpack_trees()' return value is not checked.  Is this intended?
>
> ..., but it's probably best to check and 
> exit anyway, if only in the conversion commit. (If we remove the check 
> afterward, there will be a change in the history that documents that we 
> don't need to check)

I think that is a sensible thing to do.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux