Re: [PATCH] More test cases for sanitized path names

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg.lists@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> fredagen den 1 februari 2008 skrev Junio C Hamano:
>
>> Ah, you found breakages.
>> 
>> I could not quite tell what you meant by these tests with
>> test_expect_failure, either they were misuse or "currently fails
>> but they shouldn't".  Coming up with a small reproducible
>> failure case is 50% of solving the problem.  That's very
>> appreciated.
>> ...
> I had those test cases on my machine from my earlier work on absolute
> path names so I just ran them with your code and extracted those that
> failed and put them into your testsuite instead. That's why I sent them
> so early...

Yeah, I initially did not realize that was what you were doing,
hence the above "I could not quite tell, ... but thanks now I
got it".
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux