Re: [PATCH] More test cases for sanitized path names

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2008-01-31 23:17:11 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> I'd like to make the _first_ patch after 1.5.4 to be a fix-up for
> tests that misuse test_expect_failure. After that, we can use
> test_expect_failure to mark tests that ought to pass but don't
> because of bugs in the commands.

This is precisely what StGit's test suite does, and it has a very nice
property (beyond looking tidy): it's possible to first commit a new
(failing) test, and then commit a fix for the bug that made the test
fail, and have the test suite pass at every step.

-- 
Karl Hasselström, kha@xxxxxxxxxxx
      www.treskal.com/kalle
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux