Re: Should "pull --rebase" try to be a little cleverer?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> last night an idea hit me: if I "git pull --rebase blabla master", it 
> could be that "blabla" decided to rebase "master" already, and ATM this 
> would lead to quite a few conflicts, since commits that were not mine were 
> rewritten.

Indeed.

> However, if we already have refs/remotes/blabla/master, we could DWIM the 
> --rebase call to
> 
> 	git rebase --onto FETCH_HEAD refs/remotes/blabla/master

I was believing this was already the case.  Mind you, I never verified 
it.

I think the best is really to have the equivalent of:

	git fetch blabla/master
	git rebase --onto blabla/master blabla/master@{1} HEAD


Nicolas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux