Should "pull --rebase" try to be a little cleverer?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

last night an idea hit me: if I "git pull --rebase blabla master", it 
could be that "blabla" decided to rebase "master" already, and ATM this 
would lead to quite a few conflicts, since commits that were not mine were 
rewritten.

However, if we already have refs/remotes/blabla/master, we could DWIM the 
--rebase call to

	git rebase --onto FETCH_HEAD refs/remotes/blabla/master

Of course, this would mean that git-pull would need to source 
git-parse-remote again...

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux