Hi, On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Grégoire Barbier wrote: > diff --git a/http-push.c b/http-push.c > index eef7674..2c4e91d 100644 > --- a/http-push.c > +++ b/http-push.c > @@ -2264,11 +2264,14 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) > if (!remote_tail) > remote_tail = &remote_refs; > if (match_refs(local_refs, remote_refs, &remote_tail, > - nr_refspec, (const char **) refspec, push_all)) > - return -1; > + nr_refspec, (const char **) refspec, push_all)) { > + rc = -1; > + goto cleanup; > + } > if (!remote_refs) { > fprintf(stderr, "No refs in common and none specified; doing nothing.\n"); > - return 0; > + rc = 0; > + goto cleanup; > } > > new_refs = 0; > @@ -2399,10 +2402,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) > fprintf(stderr, "Unable to update server info\n"); > } > } > - if (info_ref_lock) > - unlock_remote(info_ref_lock); > > cleanup: > + if (info_ref_lock) > + unlock_remote(info_ref_lock); > free(remote); This late in the rc cycle, together with my unfamiliarity of the code and the code paths in http.c and http-push.c would make me feel _much_ better if you could insert the "if (info_ref_lock)" before the returns, instead of replacing the returns with "goto cleanup"s... Thanks, Dscho