Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > +ifndef::git-log[] > Using these options, linkgit:git-rev-list[1] will act similar to the > more specialized family of commit log tools: linkgit:git-log[1], > linkgit:git-show[1], and linkgit:git-whatchanged[1] > +endif::git-log[] > +ifndef::git-log[] > --bisect:: > > Limit output to the one commit object which is roughly halfway between > @@ -388,6 +302,7 @@ may not compile for example). > This option can be used along with `--bisect-vars`, in this case, > after all the sorted commit objects, there will be the same text as if > `--bisect-vars` had been used alone. > +endif::git-log[] I do not like these. What you are really trying to express is "this section makes sense only in rev-list documentation", not "among the current set of documentation, the one this section does not make sense in is git-log". We might end up including this in some other documents. IOW, they should rather be "ifdef::git-rev-list[]" instead, (of course you have to define that token yourself if there isn't one already). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
