On Jan 17, 2008, at 12:35 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Pedro Melo wrote:
The content of the file is sacred, we both agree on that. We
disagree on
the filename, because for me it's more important that equal strings,
even if encoded to different byte sequences, should be treated as the
same file.
Why should the filename be _stored_ normalised? I agree on the
lookup,
yes, but not the storage.
Personally I don't care how you store it. It's an implementation
detail, and you should choose the best one for your use cases. If
that means that you store the original version and a normalized
version just for lookups, fine.
What I think its important is that if two users use different
encodings for the same string in a filename, git should treat that as
the same file.
Best regards,
--
Pedro Melo
Blog: http://www.simplicidade.org/notes/
XMPP ID: melo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Use XMPP!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
