Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 11:29:30PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Steffen Prohaska <prohaska-wjoc1KHpMeg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > I'm not sure what's causing it, but all of the addresses in your message > (including cc headers) got munged. I think Steffen's original got munged (I just replied to it) by gmane's mail relaying interface. >> > I'm asking the last question because every Unix developer should >> > think about the option, too. Neither Unix or Windows are causing >> > the problem alone. >> >> That's the logical conclusion. >> >> If you are introducing crlf = warn, that means you are declaring >> that CRLF should be treated as a disease, and that should apply >> everywhere, not just on Windows (which some people may consider >> a disease itself, but that is a separate topic). > > It's unclear to me: is such a warning only supposed to happen when we > see CRLF _after_ we have determined that a file is not actually binary? Oh, I agree. I thought that was what Steffen was proposing. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
