On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 11:29:30PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Steffen Prohaska <prohaska-wjoc1KHpMeg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: I'm not sure what's causing it, but all of the addresses in your message (including cc headers) got munged. > > I'm asking the last question because every Unix developer should > > think about the option, too. Neither Unix or Windows are causing > > the problem alone. > > That's the logical conclusion. > > If you are introducing crlf = warn, that means you are declaring > that CRLF should be treated as a disease, and that should apply > everywhere, not just on Windows (which some people may consider > a disease itself, but that is a separate topic). It's unclear to me: is such a warning only supposed to happen when we see CRLF _after_ we have determined that a file is not actually binary? Otherwise, it seems like we are punishing people on sane platforms who use binary files (although even with that check, I am slightly uncomfortable given reports of incorrect guessing). -Peff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html