Re: [PATCH] builtin-tag: fix fallouts from recent parsopt restriction.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 08:53:55PM +0000, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 12:42:51PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
> > You forgot one case.
> > 
> >     4. Everybody who does _not_ know that we traditionally did not
> >        support the form would expect "--abbrev 10" and "-n 4" to work.
> 
> I would expect "-n 4" to work, but not "--abbrev 10". But perhaps that
> is just me. If that is the expectation, I think the behavior you
> outlined is sensible.

FWIW that's exactly the opposite for me. -n4 is easy to type, and I
always do that. Though on a keyboard, ' ' is under the thumb, '=' is
harder to catch, so I tend to prefer when CLIs don't force me to use =.

-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@xxxxxxxxxx
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachment: pgpQvEl8z7cGM.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux