Re: [PATCH 2/2] pack-objects: fix threaded load balancing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nicolas Pitre schrieb:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> 
>> Nicolas Pitre schrieb:
>>> @@ -1612,10 +1620,10 @@ static void *threaded_find_deltas(void *arg)
>>>  		pthread_mutex_lock(&data_ready);
>>>  		pthread_mutex_unlock(&data_request);
>>>  
>>> -		if (!me->list_size)
>>> +		if (!me->remaining)
>>>  			return NULL;
>>>  
>>> -		find_deltas(me->list, me->list_size,
>>> +		find_deltas(me->list, &me->remaining,
>>>  			    me->window, me->depth, me->processed);
>>>  	}
>>>  }
>> This hunk caught my attention. &data_ready is locked, but not released in
>> this function.
>>
>> Looking more closely at the code surrounding this hunk, it seems that the
>> lock is released in a *different* thread than the one that locked it. This
>> works on Linux, but is not portable. We will have to use condition variables
>> like every one else does in a producer-consumer-like scenario.
> 
> Are you willing to make a patch for it?

I'm working on it, slowly.

-- Hannes

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux