Re: [PATCH 2/2] pack-objects: fix threaded load balancing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Johannes Sixt wrote:

> Nicolas Pitre schrieb:
> > @@ -1612,10 +1620,10 @@ static void *threaded_find_deltas(void *arg)
> >  		pthread_mutex_lock(&data_ready);
> >  		pthread_mutex_unlock(&data_request);
> >  
> > -		if (!me->list_size)
> > +		if (!me->remaining)
> >  			return NULL;
> >  
> > -		find_deltas(me->list, me->list_size,
> > +		find_deltas(me->list, &me->remaining,
> >  			    me->window, me->depth, me->processed);
> >  	}
> >  }
> 
> This hunk caught my attention. &data_ready is locked, but not released in
> this function.
> 
> Looking more closely at the code surrounding this hunk, it seems that the
> lock is released in a *different* thread than the one that locked it. This
> works on Linux, but is not portable. We will have to use condition variables
> like every one else does in a producer-consumer-like scenario.

Are you willing to make a patch for it?


Nicolas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux