Re: git annotate runs out of memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Daniel Berlin wrote:

> It is stored in an easier format. However, can you not simply provide
> side-indexes to do the annotation?
> 
> I guess that own't work in git because you can change history (in
> other scm's, history is readonly so you could know the results for
> committed revisions will never change).

History in git is read-only. It's just that git lets you fork and move 
forward with something different. Each commit can never change (and, in 
fact, you'd have to badly break SHA1 to change it), but which commits are 
relevant to the history can change.

Keeping extra information is fine; at worst, it'll go irrelevant.

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux