On 12/11/07, Marco Costalba <mcostalba@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Dec 11, 2007 6:33 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Annotate is treasured by gcc developers (this was a key sticking point > > in svn conversion). > > Having an annotate that is 2x slower and takes 15x memory would not > > fly (regardless of how good the results are). > > > > Speed of annotation is mainly due to getting the file history more > then calculating the actual annotation. > Yes, i figured as much. > I don't know *how* file history is stored in the others scm, perhaps > is easier to retrieve, i.e. without a full walk across the > revisions... It is stored in an easier format. However, can you not simply provide side-indexes to do the annotation? I guess that own't work in git because you can change history (in other scm's, history is readonly so you could know the results for committed revisions will never change). > I would be interested in cold start and warm cache start (close the > annotation tab and start annotation again). I will try to do this. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
