Hi, On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Robin Rosenberg wrote: > tisdag 04 december 2007 skrev Johannes Schindelin: > > > On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Jeff King wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 09:53:30PM +0100, Robin Rosenberg wrote: > > > > > > > code did not pass). Like Linus, this code does not resolve > > > > symlinks, but I forgot to state that it is by design. It solves my > > > > problem and > > > > > > By design meaning "I didn't feel like implemening it because I do > > > not personally care" or "I have some reason not to resolve > > > symlinks"? > > > > IMHO those symlinks would be a nice thing in some corner cases, but > > penalise the common case. So I tend to believe the latter. (See also > > Linus' message why he talks about his preference for the die() code > > path.) > > Actually the forme.... I don't mind it being fixed if it doesn't cost > too much. I do remember the hassles I went through with get_relative_cwd() until I broke down and used chdir() two times (ugly). So the latter reason is good enough that you do not even have to admit to the former reason ;-) Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
