Hi, On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Jeff King wrote: > On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 09:53:30PM +0100, Robin Rosenberg wrote: > > > code did not pass). Like Linus, this code does not resolve symlinks, > > but I forgot to state that it is by design. It solves my problem and > > By design meaning "I didn't feel like implemening it because I do not > personally care" or "I have some reason not to resolve symlinks"? IMHO those symlinks would be a nice thing in some corner cases, but penalise the common case. So I tend to believe the latter. (See also Linus' message why he talks about his preference for the die() code path.) Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
